Semiconductors at the heart of the US-China tech war
Published 17 January 2020 | 2 minute read
The United States and China are in the early stages of a historic tech war in an era of techno-nationalism. Phase 1 of the US-China trade deal was benign. This paper emphasizes why Phase 2 must more intently address the issues of SOE subsidies and protection of intellectual property.
How a new era of techno-nationalism is shaking up semiconductor value chains
Techno-nationalism is a new strain of mercantilist thought that links tech innovation directly to economic prosperity, social stability and to the national security policies of a nation. In this regard, government intervention in markets is considered justified to ensure protection against opportunistic or hostile state and non-state actors. Techno-nationalism seeks to attain competitive advantage for its own stakeholders, on a global scale, in order to leverage this advantage for geopolitical gain.
At stake is supremacy in the industries of the future and at the core of all these future techs are semiconductors, which provide the vital materials and circuitry necessary to produce microchips — which, in turn, are required to operate everything from a smart phone to an advanced satellite weapons system.
In 2018, global sales of semiconductors and related technology topped $468 billion. China’s semiconductor market represents, by far, the world’s largest importer. Semiconductor-related technologies are China’s largest import products, exceeding even its imports of oil.
The intensifying nature of the US-China tech war, combined with the scale and depth of China’s market — and the massive economic gains it provides to American and foreign semiconductor companies — creates a collision of vested interests that has sparked a flurry of protectionist policies in Washington and elsewhere.
Our latest white paper by Alex Capri provides a timely and comprehensive analysis of the emerging US-China tech-war and the strategic importance of the semiconductor industry.
Key insights from the study
- A detailed account of semiconductor global value chains, how they function and why certain companies dominate
- A deep dive into China’s initiatives to develop its own home-grown semiconductor sector and how this could affect the global trade landscape.
- Introduction and explanation of “Techno-nationalism,” a new strain of mercantilism that is driving industrial policy, non-tariff measures and other state-centric behavior around the world.
- A revealing analysis of how companies are restructuring operations and legally circumventing export controls and sanctions in order to protect revenue and market share.
- Future scenarios where semiconductor value chains (and the tech landscape, in general) face the challenges of fragmentation, localization and the conundrum of China’s semiconductor market.
For further reading on this topic, download our latest white paper on Strategic US-China decoupling in the tech sector.
Hear more from the author
Watch Alex Capri's recent discussion on techno-nationalism in a live webinar with the National Press Foundation (NPF). This briefing is part of a 10-part webinar series organized by National Press Foundation (NPF) on global trade during COVID-19.
In an interview with The South China Morning Post, Alex Capri, Hinrich Foundation Research Fellow, explains the impact of US-China tech tensions.
Alex Capri, Hinrich Foundation Research Fellow, discusses his latest report about the role of semiconductors in the US-China tech war.
Alex Capri's article on the critical role of semiconductors in the techno-nationalist race was republished by the Global Trade Magazine.
Our report "Semiconductors at the heart of the US-China trade war" was quoted in this Asia Times article to highlight the difficulties and challenges of US-China decoupling.
The decoupling of certain US-China value chains in the semiconductor industry has become inevitable, says Alex Capri, Hinrich Foundation Research Fellow.
Alex Capri, Hinrich Foundation Research Fellow, covers the emerging US-China tech war in a new report.