What we are reading
The surprising resilience of globalization
Published 14 November 2023
How is global trade realigning in the face of geopolitical shifts? What are the implications of the lack of progress in IPEF talks on digital trade, the rise of export controls, and China’s renewed BRI push? Explore our reading list for these latest developments.
Jump to Section
New IMF research says that, in spite of current geopolitical shifts, significant de-globalization and re-alignments are not taking place in global trade.
Examining bilateral trade flows since 1948, Serhan Cevik of the International Monetary Fund finds evidence of the long-lived and ongoing nature of globalization. Bloomberg identifies five countries acting as economic connectors in a fragmenting world. The US Senate questions an agreement with Indonesia that would enhance US-Indonesia trade but risk channeling subsidies to Chinese companies.
Long Live Globalization: Geopolitical Shocks and International Trade – Serhan Cevik, International Monetary Fund, October 27, 2023
Geopolitical re-alignment is not having a statistically significant impact on trade.
These Five Countries Are Key Economic ‘Connectors’ in a Fragmenting World – Bloomberg, November 2, 2023
Vietnam, Poland, Mexico, Morocco, and Indonesia are the world’s new supply chain connectors.
U.S. senators oppose Indonesia FTA that paves way for nickel subsidies – Nikkei Asia, November 2, 2023
US Senators fear that US subsidies will fund Chinese producers in Indonesia.
The US has changed its mind in the WTO E-Commerce Negotiations, but Simon Lester isn’t worried, per his International Economic Law and Policy blog. In the Financial Times, Alan Beattie considers why AI and data might not belong in trade deals. The US is postponing IPEF talks on digital trade, reports Nikkei Asia.
Meanwhile, China is relaxing some rules on data flows, perhaps signaling a shift from security to growth, write Martin Chorzempa and Samm Sacks for the Peterson Institute for International Economics, while the Asia-Pacific Research and Training Network on Trade – UN-ESCAP give us a primer on Multilateral and Regional Cooperation Trends in Digital Trade in Asia.
The U.S. Changes Its Mind in the WTO E-Commerce Negotiations – Simon Lester, International Economic Law and Policy Blog, October 30, 2023
An argument for why the US decision may not be a big deal.
Why AI and data might not belong in trade deals – Alan Beattie, Financial Times, November 6, 2023
Trade agreements are not necessarily the best place to litigate data protection issues.
U.S. looks to postpone IPEF talks on digital trade rules – Nikkei Asia, November 8, 2023
Another indication that the US is stepping away from its previous policies on digital trade.
China's new rules on data flows could signal a shift away from security toward growth – Martin Chorzempa and Samm Sacks, Peterson Institute for International Economics, October 3, 2023
China relaxes rules on cross-border data flows.
Multilateral and Regional Cooperation Trends in Digital Trade in the Asia-Pacific Region – Runqiu Du, Yann Duval, Maria Semenova, Natnicha Sutthivana, Asia-Pacific Research and Training Network on Trade – UN-ESCAP, October 2023
An assessment of current agreements and negotiations on digital trade involving Asia.
The Center for Strategic and International Studies considers how export controls should be optimized to address critical and emerging technologies and whether to adopt a multilateral export control regime, in two new reports.
Optimizing Export Controls for Critical and Emerging Technologies: Reviewing Control Lists, Expanded Rules, and Covered Items – William Alan Reinsch, Thibault Denamiel, and Eric Meyers, Center for Strategic and International Studies, November 8, 2023
Part two of a series considering how to right-size export controls for emerging technologies.
Establishing a New Multilateral Export Control Regime – Emily Benson and Catharine Mouradian, Center for Strategic and International Studies, November 2, 2023
The US and its allies should establish a new multilateral export control regime.
What is the true impact of China’s lending under the Belt and Road Initiative, and how is their lending changing? AidData, a research lab at William & Mary University, provides a lengthy analysis of China’s Belt and Road Reboot. The study found that China lent Pakistan US$21 billion more than previously reported, per Nikkei Asia. To counter China’s BRI influence, the US is lending to a Sri Lankan port with the help of a major Indian company, reports the New York Times.
Belt and Road Reboot: Beijing’s Bid to De-Risk Its Global Infrastructure Initiative – Bradley C. Parks, Ammar A. Malik, Brooke Escobar, Sheng Zhang, Rory Fedorochko, Kyra Solomon, Fei Wang, Lydia Vlasto, Katherine Walsh, and Seth Goodman, AidData (a research lab at William & Mary), November 6, 2023
A deep examination of China’s lending under the Belt and Road Initiative and how its practices are evolving.
China loaned Pakistan $21bn more than reported, study finds – Nikkei Asia, November 9, 2023
Pakistan may owe USD21 billion more to China than previously thought.
U.S. Finance Agency Lends to Sri Lankan Port to Counter Chinese Influence – Skandha Gunasekara and Alex Travelli, The New York Times, November 8, 2023
The US tries to counter China’s influence in development assistance, in partnership with India.
© The Hinrich Foundation. See our website Terms and conditions for our copyright and reprint policy. All statements of fact and the views, conclusions and recommendations expressed in this publication are the sole responsibility of the author(s).