Countries worldwide, especially in the West, are taking a multi-faceted approach to counter China's dominance in the critical minerals supply chain. Their strategies involve domestic investment, international partnerships, and technological innovation to reduce reliance on a single source, diversify supply chains, and build domestic capacity for mining, processing, and manufacturing.

Domestic investment and production

A key measure to counter China’s dominance is to boost domestic critical mineral production and processing. This is being done through financial incentives and streamlined regulatory processes.

The United States has enacted laws and regulations, including tax credits and grants, to encourage domestic critical mineral production and processing. Past legislation provided tax credits for electric vehicles that source a certain percentage of their critical minerals from the US or its free-trade partners. The US has also allocated billions in funding to support mining, processing, and recycling projects for minerals like lithium, cobalt, and rare earths. The US has also tried to boost domestic refining capacity for these minerals, framing it as a matter of national security.

The European Union has implemented the Critical Raw Materials Act, which sets ambitious targets for domestic production by 2030. The goal is to extract at least 10% of its annual consumption and process at least 40% within the bloc. The act also seeks to reduce administrative burdens and simplify permitting for strategic projects, aiming to shorten approval times from years to just over two years for mining and one year for processing and recycling facilities. The EU's strategy emphasizes sustainability, diversification, and resilience.

Resource-rich countries like Australia and Canada are also playing a crucial role. Australia, already a major producer of raw critical minerals, has a Critical Minerals Strategy to move into downstream processing. The government created a Critical Minerals Facility with billions in funding to support significant projects and offer tax incentives. Similarly, Canada has a Critical Minerals Strategy with billions in funding to boost exploration, mining, and processing, aiming to create a "mine-to-market" ecosystem independent of China.

International partnerships and "friend-shoring"

To diversify sources and share costs, countries are actively building new alliances and partnerships, a strategy known as "friend-shoring" or "ally-shoring." This approach aims to create secure supply chains among like-minded nations.

The Minerals Security Partnership (MSP), led by the US, is a coalition of countries, including the EU, Japan, Canada, and Australia, that aims to pool resources and finance to support critical mineral projects in allied nations. The Quad (United States, Japan, Australia, India) has also launched an initiative to secure critical mineral supplies, supporting stable and resilient supply chains and joint infrastructure projects. Such US-led groupings are often subject to later changes or abandonment by changing White House administrations.

Bilateral and multilateral agreements are also being forged. For example, Japan has long-term agreements and has invested in Australian companies like Lynas Rare Earths to secure a consistent supply of rare earths. The US and Canada have collaborated on a Joint Action Plan on Critical Minerals, leading to co-investment in North American mining and refining initiatives. The EU has also signed strategic agreements with resource-rich countries like Canada, Chile, Namibia, and Kazakhstan to secure access to essential minerals.

Technological innovation and recycling

Beyond traditional mining and processing, significant investments are being made in technology to reduce mineral dependence and increase recycling. Many countries are focusing on developing technology and infrastructure for "urban mining," which involves recovering critical minerals from electronic waste, batteries, and other industrial byproducts. This reduces the need for new extraction and lessens the environmental impact.

Researchers and companies are also working on alternative technologies that use fewer or no critical minerals. For example, Japanese firms have been at the forefront of developing electric vehicle motors that reduce or eliminate the use of heavy rare earth elements. There is also a push to develop advanced, more efficient processing and refining techniques that can operate at a lower cost and with less environmental harm, allowing Western companies to better compete with Chinese processors.

The combined measures — including industrial policies, political alliances, and technological investment — represent a fundamental shift away from relying solely on market forces.

Summary by hfAI and other AI tools, supervised by the Hinrich Foundation team.