Role of domestic policies and international cooperation in supporting digital trade

Governments increasingly recognize the potential of digital trade to contribute to economic growth and enhance competitiveness, and are adopting domestic policies to foster a conducive environment for leveraging digital technologies and platforms for cross-border digital transactions while grappling with the complexities of regulating digital trade. (p. 21)
Many developing economies still face significant barriers to full engagement in digital trade, including inadequate digital infrastructure, limited digital skills, a deficient regulatory environment, and inefficient payment systems; addressing these barriers can contribute to development; international cooperation can play an important role in supporting developing economies to participate in digital trade by maximizing positive cross-border spillovers and minimizing negative ones through the exchange of knowledge, expertise, and resources. (p. 21)
Investment in infrastructure and policies to ensure reliable and affordable internet access is key to digital trade growth; modern and reliable digital connectivity and ICT infrastructure, including through fiber-optic networks and advanced mobile telecommunications, is critical, but many developing economies lack access to these technologies and many people (2.6 billion, or one-third of the global population) do not have any access to the internet; even with internet access, the high cost of internet services hinders use in many countries; investment plays an important role in expanding and enhancing digital infrastructure to ensure widespread and reliable connectivity; comprehensive policies ensuring competition in the telecommunications sector and incentives for operators to supply low-income consumers are essential to fostering the use of digital networks; trade policies can promote digital connectivity by reducing trade barriers and fostering competition in telecommunications. (pp. 22-24, Figures C.1-C.2)
Policies to support the development of digital skills of consumers and firms are crucial to facilitate digital trade: a high level of internet usage does not guarantee robust engagement of consumers and firms in digital trade, and lack of digital skills is an important barrier; developing the full range of digital skills, from basic to specialist, and integrating ICT training are critical for participation and make digital trade more inclusive and navigate the evolving demands of the labor market. (pp. 24-25)
International cooperation can bridge the digital gap by enhancing digital connectivity and skills: financing digital connectivity is crucial to broaden its reach, enhance its stability and make it more affordable and can be done by pooling resources and expertise across borders; digital connectivity, including reducing tariffs on ICT equipment and developing infrastructure, is addressed in cooperative efforts under international trade agreements like the WTO’s Information Technology Agreement (ITA), in regional trade agreements, and through Aid for Trade; international cooperative efforts under the ILO, ITC, ITU, UNCITRAL, and others are helping economies develop skills needed to benefit from international trade; improving foreign investment environments and trade-related services sector policies is key to attracting private investment to develop connectivity. (pp. 25-26)
A robust, well-defined, and effective domestic regulatory framework is crucial for a stable and secure digital trade environment and fostering trust and confidence among businesses and consumers, including addressing electronic authentication and signatures, consumer protections, privacy, and IP rules; an enabling regulatory environment magnifies the benefits of digital connectivity for trade, especially for digitally delivered services, but domestic regulatory environments are becoming more restrictive in many cases. (pp. 26-27, Figure C.3)
Digital trade is increasingly disciplined through bilateral and regional trade agreements (RTAs) (33 percent of all RTAs as of 2022) covering a wide array of issues (i.e., privacy and data protection, cross-border data flow, and cybersecurity), though detailed digital trade provisions are limited to RTAs with high- and middle- income economies. (pp. 26-30, Figures C.4-C.5, Boxes C.1-C.2)
Existing WTO agreements cover e-commerce even without specific references to it; GATS commitments cover digital trade in services, though many GATS commitments relevant for digital trade are nearly 30 years old and do not necessarily reflect actual services market conditions; trade in digitally ordered goods is subject to existing WTO rules on trade in goods, including MFN and national treatment; the TRIPS agreement covers trade in intangible digital products, particularly disciplines on the non-discriminatory availability of IP rights, and extends to products traded online and online commercial activity; most WTO members think existing WTO rules on digital trade need updating, with 90 members negotiating rules on trade-related aspects of e-commerce under a Joint Statement Initiative; new cooperative international trade initiatives, including the E-commerce Capacity Building Framework, have been launched to support developing economies’ participation in digital trade negotiations. (p. 29, Figure C.5)
The WTO’s moratorium on customs duties on electronic transmissions is a key issue at its 13^th Ministerial Conference in February 2024 (the deadline for extending or ending it); some members advocate in favor of the moratorium, citing its importance for a stable and predictable environment for digital trade, reducing trade costs and promoting innovation; others are against extension, raising concerns about foregone customs revenues, lack of clarity on scope of the moratorium and the definition of electronic transmissions. (p. 31)
An assessment of the full impact of the moratorium calculating all potential losses and benefits is needed; although the scope and definition of electronic transmissions are uncertain under the moratorium, studies have estimated that the customs revenue loss from the moratorium is below 0.33% of overall government revenue on average; any assessment would have to take into account existing commitments in RTAs and other agreements like the WTO ITA, that separately impose a moratorium (currently binding 87 economies); domestic taxes like VAT and GST regimes offer another, non-discriminatory, way to collect revenue from digital trade that are unaffected by the moratorium and may completely offset any losses in customs revenue caused by the moratorium; less-developed economies face challenges implementing these taxes effectively; imposing customs duties on electronic transmissions would reduce relevant digital trade and lower its benefits. (pp. 31-35, Table C.1, Figures C.6-C.7)
Digitally ordered goods trade can benefit from the full implementation of the WTO Trade Facilitation Agreement (TFA) as the speed and cost at which digitally ordered goods are traded and delivered are influenced by the efficiency of customs and logistical procedures, while trade facilitation tools can lower trade costs and boost digitally ordered goods transactions; the TFA has promoted digitalization in border processes worldwide, estimated to have reduced trade costs by 4.5 percent, though automation and streamlining of border procedures remains a work in progress in lower-income economies, requiring more implementation assistance from Aid for Trade, UNCTAD, and other efforts. (pp. 34 and 36)
Digital trade raises regulatory issues concerning cross-border data flows, competition, and online consumer protection that could benefit from deeper international cooperation. (p. 36)
Cross-border data flows are pivotal to the expansion and efficiency of digital trade, as access to comprehensive data is becoming a source of comparative advantage; cross-border data flows raise policy concerns including privacy, consumer protection, competition, cybersecurity, and national security, prompting economies to condition data movement or mandate domestic data storage; four different approaches to regulating data flows have been adopted worldwide: 1) absence of regulation, 2) “open safeguard” regulations allowing transfers while holding entities accountable for data misuse, 3) “pre-authorized safeguards” requiring government approval before data transfer, and 4) ad-hoc authorizations allowing transfers on a case-by-case basis; this fragmentation in approaches hinders data protection and digital trade, underscoring the need for increased international cooperation, especially in light of many multinational agreements incorporating rules on data flows. (pp. 36-38, Figure C.8)
Competition policy fostering a transparent and pro-competitive business environment is vital for supporting and developing the digital economy, stimulating innovation and a culture of continuous improvement; digital trade’s growth has been fueled by new business models and products based on digital platforms offering consumers a wide range of services which allow sellers access to global markets and greater efficiency, but also exert and concentrate significant market power across segments of the digital economy and large data streams; high market concentration in the digital economy raises challenges for market players and consumers; governments are seeking ways to regulate the digital economy to address related competition concerns and strengthen enforcement against anti-competitive conduct; international cooperation between competition authorities is crucial to addressing these challenges as digital platforms transcend borders. (pp. 38-39)
Enhancing online consumer protections builds trust in digital markets, while lack of protection erodes trust and hinders digital trade growth; online consumer protection policies aim to provide consumers in the digital realm the same level of protection as those in traditional commerce, including regulations against online deceptions, disclosure requirements, and liability regimes; effective enforcement and international cooperation is essential, as online sales cross borders; some international instruments already set out guidelines and best practices; enhanced cross-border collaboration among consumer protection authorities is crucial for enforcement and addressing violations across multiple jurisdictions, though such collaboration remains limited. (pp. 39-41)
With respect to each of these regulatory issues, developing economies, especially the least developed countries (LDCs), face challenges, including resource constraints, in adopting and enforcing policies and laws needed to address them; more technical expertise, policy formulation assistance and support, infrastructure, and other resources are needed to enable them to successfully address these cross-border challenges. (pp. 38-40)