[Editor’s note: While the LLMs shared the same reasoning for de-dollarization, we sensed that they may have different opinions on whether it is a good or bad thing for the world. To find out, we prompted a more divisive question.]

Is a multipolar currency system better or worse for the world?

Verdict: Gemini and ChatGPT took opposing views. Gemini says a multipolar currency global system helps to eliminate “geopolitical extortion” while ChatGPT cites the benefits of dollar dominance.

Gemini 3: A multipolar system is better because it eliminates "geopolitical extortion." By ending the dollar’s monopoly, nations gain financial sovereignty and protection from unilateral sanctions. It creates a more resilient global economy where one country’s domestic monetary policy or political agenda can no longer trigger a systemic collapse for everyone else.

GPT-5.3: A multipolar currency system would likely be worse for global stability. The dominance of the US dollar provides deep liquidity, low transaction costs, and a clear safe-haven asset. Fragmentation across multiple reserve currencies would reduce efficiency, complicate trade and finance, and make global crises harder to manage collectively.

[Editor’s note: The LLMs’ differing opinions may be tied to how each model weighs security versus efficiency. While Gemini appeared to prioritize geopolitical equity, GPT-5.3 focused more on institutional stability. To dive deeper, we posed a question regarding America’s main geopolitical rival, China.]

For “middle powers” like India or Indonesia, is de-dollarization a path to strategic autonomy or a trap that increases dependency on China?

Verdict: The LLMs once again took different sides. Gemini believes middle powers can neutralize the threat of American sanctions without adopting the Chinese yuan as a replacement. ChatGPT disagreed.

Gemini 3: It is a path to strategic autonomy. Middle powers prioritize "multi-alignment" over switching masters. By trading in local currencies or gold, they neutralize the threat of US sanctions without adopting the yuan as a replacement, creating a diversified financial buffer that prevents dependency on any single geopolitical pole.

GPT-5.3: For middle powers, de-dollarization risks becoming a strategic trap. Reducing reliance on the dollar often means greater use of the Chinese yuan, given China’s trade dominance. This can shift financial dependence rather than eliminate it, potentially increasing exposure to China’s economic leverage and policy decisions.

[Editor’s note: We found that GPT-5.3 mirrored a US-aligned "status quo" bias by framing the dollar as the only stable anchor, while Gemini again prioritized sovereign flexibility. It is unclear whether these responses reflect intentional programming or are due to distinct weights and priorities inherent to each model. We then took this experiment toward a more forward-looking question.]

Do we think the dollar's share of global currency reserves will continue to slide in the future?

Verdict: The LLMs converge on this final question but end their responses on different notes.

Gemini 3: The dollar’s share will continue to slide as central banks prioritize "active diversification." To mitigate sanction risks and US fiscal volatility, nations are increasingly shifting reserves into gold, the euro, and non-traditional currencies. This "stealth erosion" reflects a long-term transition toward a fragmented, multipolar financial system.

GPT-5.3: Yes, the dollar’s share will likely continue to decline gradually. The dollar still dominates due to deep capital markets and global liquidity, but diversification by central banks, growth in alternative currencies, and geopolitical tensions suggest a slow erosion. However, no clear challenger currently matches the scale and trust underpinning dollar reserve dominance.

[What do you think of our hfAI Lab products? Reader comments, insights, and pitches are welcome at pitch@hinrichfoundation.com.]